William McGowan
My feedback
-
25 votes
This is one of the features that we will be looking to bring across into the New List Edit so the behaviour is the same as the ‘Classic’ editing experience.
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes0 comments · Talis Aspire Digitised Content » Request details & Upload · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
We think this is a valuable idea and something we will wish to investigate in the future, however its not in our near term development focu so its on our longer term backlog
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesWilliam McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
We are considering this for the next round of work we will do on the Reviews area of Talis Aspire and will feedback to our UX and Development Teams,
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
We are investigating the possibilities of this and the priority within the Continuous Improvement work.
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes11 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We would like to improve the ability to display as much info that we have about a resource even if it is not the specific format that was originally bookmarked.
A redesign of how we display holdings would probably be required and this is not currently in our short term development focus.
This idea so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
66 votesunder review · 12 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
With New List Edit the Delete warning is already much stronger, however, this specific request has come up in feedback and we plan to address this with clearer messaging about the impact on Digitisations. This is not currently scheduled but we will update as this moves to the top of our priorities.
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesplanned · 3 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Bookmarking · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
102 votes
We would like to add some additional resource types.
However, this is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
105 votesbacklog · 22 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William McGowan
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesWilliam McGowan
supported this idea
·
I'm not sure whether any more consideration has been given to this idea since 2016 but I'll leave my two cents as I think it remains highly relevant.
As already pointed out, this feature would be especially useful when we receive a second review of a list with a couple of new additions that need to be ordered, without reviewing the whole list. It would be advantageous over filtering the list by "Alerts", as it would immediately indicate that only a few items need to be ordered, rather than relying on the assistants to realise that the whole list doesn't need to be reviewed for the sake of a few new additions. In this way, it would account for different workflows (e.g. how people use the review filters).
I also agree with other comments re efficiency of communications - perhaps the feature could be assigned a permission under certain roles to limit who can use it (e.g. librarians but not academics)?