Joseph Munzer
My feedback
6 results found
-
15 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Joseph Munzer supported this idea ·
-
72 votes
Please do continue to vote and add your use case to this idea. As votes and comments are added we are able to use these to review and build a case for the idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment Joseph Munzer supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joseph Munzer commented
Yes!
I imagine that the total number of changes made via the API routes over the last year would be a strong case for pushing some of these functions into the core product!
Joseph Munzer supported this idea ·
-
62 votes
Joseph Munzer supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Joseph Munzer supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Joseph Munzer shared this idea ·
This has been open for 8 years! Is there a reason why users wouldn't want LCN-linked TARL records to be updated from the LMS on a regular/targeted basis?
Keen to hear of any use-cases for 'not' wanting this functionality.