R Bramley
My feedback
19 results found
-
36 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
9 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Thank you for all the feedback relating to the sections and the difficulties around defining them. We will be making some changes to these to make them more distinct. We will update as these become available.
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Agreed - it's hard to even point out when training staff on-screen!
R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
With the changes to the list edit screens we are keen to review this and make it possible to undo some actions within the list.
R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
I'd echo Kirsty's comment: This could be something to help our Working from Home situation by easily identifying relevant review requests.
R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
62 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Good idea, it might need to keep its colour difference too, to stand out.
-
101 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
We are currently reviewing this idea as this is an interesting concept and one we would like to explore further. If anyone would like to add their use case to this ticket it would be helpful to understand all scenarios.
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
As stated last summer: "If we could set the current year's lists to 'read only' (after rollover), we'd be happy."
Use case: We have a 3 month overlap of time periods during which we're just crossing fingers that tutors go to the right version when editing. Yes, there are remedial steps we can take, if alerted, but "prevention is better than cure"!
Looking forward to updates on this development.
Best wishes to all,
Rachel.An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Not sure about adding list status to the API, as I'm clearly not that technical.
We do have issues with the overlap of 2 time periods. We roll over in May, to create the next year's lists. We keep the current year's lists until Sept, to cover exams & re-sits. If we could set the current year's lists to 'read only', we'd be happy.R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
This idea is under review. We would be interested to know if you feel having information like this would cause confusion to students as to whether the library holds the items or not. If you do have feedback then please do add your comments as we would like to understand this more.
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
We removed our John Smiths link as it always said 'Out of stock' - that was what led to confusion. I think academics would like a world cat link & they'd be clear about what it meant. Depending on what was visible on screen it may need to be quite explicit to be clear to students too.
R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Yes - team members don’t really use the alert now because it’s so generic.
They don’t really pay much attention to the alerts unless it’s the “new” alert, because the exclamation point is such a catch all. However, a flag for new editions wouldn't save me any time because I don't really trust the "new edition" function, so I always check with Amazon/Oasis regardless. I've found this function to be really hit and miss; it sometimes shows the flag even if there isn’t a new edition, or tells you it can’t find any edition information. I’ve seen it get confused with different formats (e/paper/hardback) as well. This'd need to be fixed by Talis (if possible) before I could get any use out of a separate flag. -
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Yes. This is something I’ve wished for in my head quite a few times – we do my article/link checking from the list view to check the links work with the proxy added on, and it’s really annoying to then have to click through every item on the review screen to mark it completed.
It would be really helpful to be able to select multiple items in review and the set the review outcome in bulk and the icons would be a definite improvement. -
47 votes
We are investigating the possibilities of this and the priority within the Continuous Improvement work.
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Here at Sussex we're very interested in making more effective use of the 'blue' button' (old list view) or 'View Online' link (new list view) and the potential reporting solutions and analytics data it could provide.
R Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
I'm going to raise this as feedback on List View Beta - the display is better, as it keeps the sections and changes citations to the chosen bibliographic style on screen, but it doesn't export in this style.
In order to 'sell' Aspire to tutors, the successful export of a reading list in sections AND in the correct style would be a winner. They could create a reading list in Aspire and then export it and stick it in their handbooks, which would save them a job, and is something that we're trying very hard to convince them to do. -
27 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
This definitely makes a lot of sense - at the reviewing stage, we'd like to be able to do everything without coming out of the screen if possible. I think it would be a good thing to try to incorporate at this Beta stage.
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment R Bramley
commented
Yes, it would be useful to users, and easy for the provider to capture in a report, surely?
-
36 votesR Bramley
supported this idea
·
We created 'Urgent' as a Stage, so that requested reviews could be filtered by this & tackled as a priority if needed.