MMU
My feedback
16 results found
-
62 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
An error occurred while saving the comment MMU
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
We are currently reviewing this idea as this is an interesting concept and one we would like to explore further. If anyone would like to add their use case to this ticket it would be helpful to understand all scenarios.
An error occurred while saving the comment MMU
commented
Really the same point as Rachel B. We roll over in May, but the academic year periods start in July. So although the newly rolled over lists aren't 'live' til July, these are the ones that should be worked on from May onwards. The ability to set the lists attached to the previous academic year time period, to read only would be very beneficial. Library staff, and more importantly academics would then only be able to edit the newly rolled over list.
This would be a really beneficial development
Thanks
JoMMU
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus but is something we woudl like to explore in the future
It has been placed into moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
71 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
We would like to improve the ability to display as much info that we have about a resource even if it is not the specific format that was originally bookmarked.
A redesign of how we display holdings would probably be required and this is not currently in our short term development focus.
This idea so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
This is not in our near term development focus, so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Dashboard 2.0 already includes some functionality to inform academics about availability of materials on their list and there are plans to bring this out of BETA soon.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
We have introduced bulk actions into the reporting area of Talis Aspire, you can now bulk archive and bulk publish. You can find out more on these here: https://support.talis.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000292238-Bulk-list-actions
We are continuing to review other uses for the bulk actions.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesMMU
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
We have begun work on the anonymising of user profiles. If you have anyone that raises this under GDPR before this work is released then please do raise a support ticket with the details.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
This is a valuable idea and user management is an area I would like us to investigate further in the future.
However its not in our near term development focus, so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment MMU
commented
As we are still in the stage of library staff creating lists, and adding a vast number of bookmarks linking to electronic articles for some of our subjects, a standard set of entry fields would speed the process up!
MMU
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
MMU
shared this idea
·
We'd like to make the message more encouraging for our academics to accept and get involved with their reading lists. We