Kristy
My feedback
79 results found
-
11 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
I too would like more filters (inc. date range) for this type of monitoring that are simple to use and perform comparisons for Mangement and internal reporting.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
Thank you for all the feedback relating to the sections and the difficulties around defining them. We will be making some changes to these to make them more distinct. We will update as these become available.
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
We've had feedback on lack of contrast from library and academic staff, we would like to see improvements on this too.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
In addition to a notification I'd like to see the introduction of auto date/time stamp and userID added to library notes. When our team add library notes we date and inital so our history of actions is clear but we don't know when or how old notes from academic staff are. We don't automatically see them unless a list is sent for review or picked up via an All LIst Items report and they may not be current instructions/requests.
In addition this idea I raised in June 2018 to have different icons for types of alerts in reviews could help make new library notes more identifable in that workflow too https://ideas.talis.com/forums/32805-talis-aspire-reading-lists/suggestions/34688236-icons-for-different-types-of-alerts-items-with-chKristy
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
All for a recycle bin or backup version, not just for lists but also sections. We keep list deletion permissions locked down to System Admins we have had instances where large sections of lists have been accidentally deleted.
More detailed 'Recent Changes' history in TARL (where changes made in draft lists as well as published) would help here too, including timestamp/date/log in so list of changes additions/deletions can be tracked)
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
71 votesKristy
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
I have previously voted and supported idea https://ideas.talis.com/forums/171519-talis-aspire-digitised-content/suggestions/6238549-deletion-of-bookmark-with-request-linked-to-it too
Flagging both the presence of digitisation if deleting a bookmark or an entire list is relevant, as part of the TARL TADC integration there ought to be a warning for users (and change of status of the request from Live to Withdrawn in TADC would also be useful). We've had a re-request for digitisation just this week which was initially rejected by TADC (exceeding limit) but the original bookmark had been deleted, creating additional work for library and academic staff.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
We’ve also found that since switching on new list edit our number of lists with unpublished changes have gone up considerably.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
102 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
Would like to have this feature available, would help address requests where academics want to merge lists and have an easier and more user friendly process.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesKristy
shared this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kristy
commented
Could you update on the planned status for this idea please. Since changing LMS we need to montior our metadata refresh is capturing LCNs correctly and would like an exportable report of what has and hasn't been linked, rather than running and merging all list item reports before and after.
Kristy
supported this idea
·
Yes we encounter this and it's a fiddle to do manually- it's got our vote!