Clinton Bell
My feedback
-
34 votesbacklog · 8 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reporting · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesunder review · 0 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesunder review · 1 comment · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Config & Customisation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Clinton Bell
commented
Reversing the order (newest to oldest) might also help. The current teaching periods are the most likely to be selected, so it would make sense for them to be at or near the top.
-
50 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
We would like to review the dashboard can be shared with academics where permissions and roles are not given to them.
However, this is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
With the change in New List Edit the importance field is now more prominent and highlighted in red when it has not been set.
We will continue to review this functionality in line with Continued Improvements.
An error occurred while saving the comment Clinton Bell
commented
I would prefer this to remain non-compulsory, at least for the moment. We don't rely on Aspire for ordering and the way the importance feature is currently used doesn't always map very well to our lists.
eg. for us a "prescribed text" would normally mean a textbook students are expected to purchase, but there is no option for other required readings, such as from journals or online sources.
A lot of our academics also like to have the prescribed text and required / recommended / suggested readings in separate sections, as this is more obvious for the students and allows navigation directly to a section via the Table of Contents. This makes setting the importance tags somewhat redundant. There is an option to sort by importance, but that completely removes the sections so you can no longer see which topic or week a reading is needed for (if the list is set up that way) and means an extra click to change the sorting every time you look at the list.
-
94 votes
We have been reviewing this idea following on from the list edit work that has been taking place and would like to now explore this piece further.
This is an example of how an idea may be declined at a point in time but as we explore and develop new areas we do review all ideas past and present and consider them all.
Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
We think this is a valuable idea and something we will wish to investigate in the future, however its not in our near term development focu so its on our longer term backlog
Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesbacklog · 0 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Clinton Bell
supported this idea
·
Being able to export the statistics would also allow for easier comparison and analysis of aggregate statistics, e.g. you could easily calculate the total number of clicks, or the number of lists created by each faculty.