Andrew Loverock
My feedback
11 results found
-
99 votes
We have been reviewing this idea following on from the list edit work that has been taking place and would like to now explore this piece further.
This is an example of how an idea may be declined at a point in time but as we explore and develop new areas we do review all ideas past and present and consider them all.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
102 votesAndrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesAndrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrew Loverock
commented
I agree strongly with Richard and Philip. I simply cannot get enough data out of Aspire currently to help with workflow management and to inform other library colleagues about progress with reviews.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
We are investigating the possibilities of this and how it fits into the current Continuous Improvement themes.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesAndrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
104 votes
We would like to add some additional resource types.
However, this is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
We are considering this for the next round of work we will do on the Reviews area of Talis Aspire and will feedback to our UX and Development Teams,
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
We would like to consider this when we next review the acquisitions area of Talis Aspire.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
We would like to consider this when we next review the acquisitions area of Talis Aspire.
Andrew Loverock
supported this idea
·
This would be particularly useful for giving academics detailed reports on the review of their lists.