Richard Cross
My feedback
19 results found
-
68 votes
Richard Cross supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Richard Cross supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Richard Cross supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Richard Cross supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
An error occurred while saving the comment Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
7 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
32 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog while we focus on items in the development focus.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
As part of integration theme
An error occurred while saving the comment Richard Cross commented
Hi Chris
On (1) - sure that could be a useful approach. The current API returns URL/label for matching lists, with a list level (rather than an item level) link. A method which returned the item URI, and importance value, and list URL/label would have real advantages.
One other core piece of data here is enrolment numbers. While academics can add this data in a a free-text field at the point of submission for Library review, they are not obliged to and there's no guarantee that the figure will be accurate and current. One thing we're thinking of, is how to tie in the API to a local data call which could return student numbers for that module/list.
When reviewing an ISBN that would then tell us:
* How many lists is this ISBN present on?
* What are the importance settings for each occurence of the ISBN?
* How many students are enrolled on course lists referencing that ISBN?On (2), yes, we're interested in related editions. We're also interested in the ability to query a list of (unrelated) ISBNs in one single pass, and thinking about ways that the API could help. Here's a use case: I have 15 books that have been flagged for withdrawal. Before I pull them from stock I want to make sure that they are not present on any Resource Lists. Rather than run 15 sequential API calls, I'd rather run one and get out a report of all IBSNs in one pass.
At a simpler level, if pre-API call we match ISBN-10 with ISBN-13, it would be good to be able to ask Aspire about the occurence of both (one item record may include ISBN-10 alone, the other ISBN-13 alone).
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Richard Cross commented
No longer relevant to us, so have unvoted our 1 vote for this
-
38 votes
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
The reviews refresh will be ensuring we capture this data but in the first instance will not be providing this report. We will return to this once the new reviews is up and running so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Richard Cross commented
Could this be combined with http://aspireideas.talis.com/forums/32805-aspire-ideas/suggestions/943685-current-session-timeout-warning
An error occurred while saving the comment Richard Cross commented
Could this Idea be combined with: http://aspireideas.talis.com/forums/32805-aspire-ideas/suggestions/547635-improved-handling-of-expired-sessions
Richard Cross shared this idea ·
-
7 votes
Might it be possible to have a slightly more open Type than 'paper'? The material might be a paper, but equally it could be a set of Powerpoint slides or a Prezi, an entry on SlideShare, some lecture notes, or the full-text of a speech or presentation. How about something like 'Presentation / Lecture'?