Lucy Clifford
My feedback
-
3 votesLucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
71 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes2 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
If it isn't possible to allow html or other formatting options, maybe give the option to add multiple student note fields.
-
60 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
It might also be helpful to highlight all new items/sections on a list that have not been published with the yellow warning background. Then you could see exactly what will not be visible on the published version.
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes10 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Config & Customisation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Please do continue to vote and add your use case to this idea. As votes and comments are added we are able to use these to review and build a case for the idea.
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesLucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesLucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesLucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesstarted · 4 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
Yes please. Why remove something so useful?
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes0 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Config & Customisation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Lucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
10 votesunder review · 3 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
This does need to be more noticable. The hover contrast is bad too.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
Alan, this is already possible - our OpenURLs from Aspire all contain sid=talis:aspire. Ask Talis and I think they can do this for you.
-
8 votes3 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
This is a good idea. Ideally the system would allow for a dual print/ebook item but I can see this would be difficult to programme given the variety of methods there are of cataloguing print and e.
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
You can filter for digitised items in the old list view but for some reason they've taken it away in the new view.
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
The all-or-nothing approach to adding authentication to article links that Aspire uses does not work. It needs to be optional so we can choose which links should be authenticated - and which authentication method to use, where an organisation uses more than 1 form of authentication.
-
3 votesLucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
There needs to be some mechanism for adding or removing proxy authentiation from article links so that we can link to both subscribed and free resources.
-
4 votes1 comment · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Config & Customisation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Lucy Clifford
shared this idea
·
-
85 votes
We have been reviewing this idea following on from the list edit work that has been taking place and would like to now explore this piece further.
This is an example of how an idea may be declined at a point in time but as we explore and develop new areas we do review all ideas past and present and consider them all.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
This isn't a very logical response. If you have timed release of sections in your Learning Management System but a fully published list in Aspire, then your lists *will* be out of sync - there's nothing you can do to prevent it.
If you add a 'hide section' option into Aspire which is respected by the LTI tools, then only visible sections in Aspire will be visible in your LMS, so both systems will always be in sync.
This functionality is something our academics have also asked for, for many years.
-
6 votes
We are working on bookmarking functionality alongside our List Edit improvements, this will reduce the reliance on the bookmarklet feature and enable more resources to be accessible in the List Edit context. When this feature is released, we will revisit this idea to understand if it still has relevance.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
We would like this. We've had a complaint from an academic who imported around 100 citations into a new list - he then had to manually merge this new list with an existing list. The academic was extremely unhappy about the additional work.
Lucy Clifford
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Clifford
commented
Alternatively, if Aspire finds multiple hits for an ISBN in your LMS could it offer the choice of which one to bookmark? If possible, it would identify whether an item was print or e and give the end user the option to bookmark either one. It should be able to distinguish (in most cases) by the presence of a web address. in the 856 field.
This could help both with the problem of print being bookmarked instead of ebooks and to alert the academic to the fact the book exists in both forms.
This is more urgently needed in the new edit as you can no longer drag and drop bookmarks. Colleagues quite often have to create 2 near identical lists, for modues with 2 separate cohorts. By using drag and drop they can reasonably quickly create a section in one list, then replicate the same section in the second list (using drag and drop on the same bookmarks). They are concerned about how much extra time this is going to take in the new edit as each bookmark needs to be searched for.