Keji Adedeji
My feedback
10 results found
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
107 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keji Adedeji
commented
I've got a question about this, are you using this field as a means of communicating with the academic?
If so, is this because there is no way for the academic to see the review outcome of the individual item?
-
32 votes
This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog while we focus on items in the development focus.
Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.
An error occurred while saving the comment Keji Adedeji
commented
Hi Laura,
This is not in progress, we will review this following the completion of the Ideas Survey.
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keji Adedeji
commented
Additional comments by Michael Fake @ LSE
It would be incredibly useful to have the most commonly used fields ready for data entry when creating or editing a bookmark.
e.g. when entering an Article manually, or editing an existing article, I almost always need to add:
- Journal tab (with Journal title and ISSN)
- Article title
- Author
- Volume
- Issue
- Date
- Page numbersFor books I mostly need to add:
- Title
- Author
- Date
- PublisherAt the moment I have to select and add each of these fields in turn, which is fiddly and time-consuming, especially when I'm adding multiple resources. It would be much more helpful if the system had these fields ready and waiting for me to enter the data when I choose the relevant item type.
-
15 votesKeji Adedeji
responded
We are investigating this in the reviews theme
-
6 votes
-
99 votes
We have been reviewing this idea following on from the list edit work that has been taking place and would like to now explore this piece further.
This is an example of how an idea may be declined at a point in time but as we explore and develop new areas we do review all ideas past and present and consider them all.
-
8 votes
We are currently working with Beta partners on the automation of the hierarchy.
-
15 votes
Using the All List Report does allow you to see who last published a reading list. As changes to a list may have been done by library staff updating a link it may confuse if this is in the front end under ‘recent changes’ as to why the list was published by someone other than the academic. We will keep an open watch on this idea though.
-
4 votes
Could you provide some use cases where you wouldn't want the requester notified? Is this mostly where library staff are the ones who have created a list and sent it through for review?