Rebecca Naughten
My feedback
-
36 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes12 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Config & Customisation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Please do continue to vote and add your use case to this idea. As votes and comments are added we are able to use these to review and build a case for the idea.
Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesbacklog · 10 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reporting · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesRebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesplanned · 3 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Bookmarking · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
We are currently reviewing this idea as this is an interesting concept and one we would like to explore further. If anyone would like to add their use case to this ticket it would be helpful to understand all scenarios.
Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesunder review · 3 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
This is one of the features that we will be looking to bring across into the New List Edit so the behaviour is the same as the ‘Classic’ editing experience.
Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes2 comments · Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Viewing Lists & Items · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes4 comments · Talis Aspire Digitised Content » Request Views & Search · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We are reviewing this idea to see if it will be possible to filter items by no stage set.
An error occurred while saving the comment Rebecca Naughten
commented
Our workaround for this issue is that a) if a person is dealing with a request (even temporarily - e.g. they are ordering the required book, but won't necessarily be the person doing the digitisation when it arrives), they assign the request to themselves, b) we set up a OneNote notebook for our team relating to digitisations - we have different tabs for the different categories ('Copy Pending', 'Source needs to be acquired'); whoever picks up a request adds a new page for that request number under the appropriate tab, and adds any pertinent info ('Book ordered from supplier X, [date]'). Anyone following along behind you can see what the state of play is with a given request by looking in OneNote, and if a request is assigned to someone we assume that they are actively dealing with it. The OneNote pages get deleted when the digitisation is complete (unless there was something complicated in the history, in which case the page is kept in an older section).
-
51 votesunder review · 23 comments · Talis Aspire Digitised Content » Reading List · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
We are reviewing this idea, as feel it is an important measurement for usage of scans.
Rebecca Naughten
supported this idea
·
I would expand the idea to include a warning about live digitisations when a list is being archived - we have seen that as well.