We often have bookmarks for book chapters where the url to the book as a whole is entered into the 'is part of book' section, without a separate url to the book chapter entered into the chapter section. This is done as it is sometimes not possible to link directly to a chapter. In these cases, we add a student note along the lines of "Please read pages 57-69".

In the All List Items report, DOI fields that are present in the 'is part of' section are included (though not in a separate field), but the url present in the 'is part of' section is not included.

One of the key performance indictors for the readings service is to measure the use of electronic resources, but we are not able to easily identify such list items as an electronic resource.

We would like the All List Items report to include the url data from the 'is part of' section.

In conjunction with this, we would find it really useful to be able to distinguish between the DOI/url fields in 'chapter' or 'article' section and the 'is part of' section. For example, sometimes the article DOI is entered on the 'is part of' section and not in the 'article' section; it would be helpful to be able to easily identify these errors so that they can be corrected.