This was discovered during a recent process evaluation conducted by the University of Nottingham and Talis. We were wondering if there was any news on whether or not this will go forward, and if so, when the next round of work in the Reviews section may begin: https://phrazle.co

This was discovered during a recent process evaluation conducted in collaboration with Talis for the University of Nottingham. At the moment, leaving the review, finding the relevant reading list, and identifying the correct item on the list is required in order to raise a scanning request for it.
https://wordsfromletters.co/

This is a great idea because we frequently need to return to the list, enter edit mode, find the content, and then submit a https://word-hurdle.com/ review request.

This has been identified in a recent process review carried out in conjunction with Talis for the University of Nottingham. We wondered if there was any update on whether this might go ahead and when the next round of work for the Reviews area is likely to be.

Please see Jenny Hill’s comment below on the value this would add to our current workflows.

I would like to have some way of moving seamlessly move from Reading lists to TADC and vice vera? If this idea is devleoped, please add a feature to help us move back in the other direction too.

This would be very useful for us at the University of Nottingham.
We have an efficient workflow for dealing with scanning requests which the Talis integration with the DCS is going to streamline for us. When our Acquisitions and Collections staff are reviewing lists they sometimes come across entries which it would be sensible to raise a scanning request for - a service which we hope to expand due the time savings the DCS integration will bring us.
At the moment it is necessary to leave the review, find the relevant reading list and identify the correct item on the list in order to raise a scanning request for it. If they could do this by clicking a button within the reviews screen it would save significant time and allow us to improve our service.

Interesting - How would the licence limits work for chapters ? e.g. where a book has been referred to several times on a list, with no or the same importance every time?

This is an excellent idea, as we often need to go back open the list, go into edit, find the content then request review

This is an excellent idea as we often then need to go back to the list and then edit to do this