Hazel Rothera

My feedback

  1. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    Very much agree with Catherine's comment of 30th January about the wording of the Unpublished Changes banner for those who have Force Review on. I hadn't noticed that, as I have Acquisitions role myself so don't see the same wording! Should definitely be changed as Catherine suggests, to make it clearer that the list will NOT be reviewed until the academic hits Publish.

    Hazel Rothera shared this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    Yes, agree, for the same reasons as highlighted by Alice. Our library staff also find the in-built search problematic because it turns off the blue editing bar. Example scenario: an academic has made such a mess of a bookmark that rather than editing their bookmark, it's quicker to navigate to the item anew (eg journal article) and re-bookmark it. However, you then need to know where in the list the academic's original bookmark is, so you can drop your replacement one next to it and then delete the dud one. Once you've used Search to locate the dud bookmark, you then can't add your new one as the blue Edit bar is gone. So have to revert to the four-step process outlined by Alice.

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  3. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    We've been told for years that the ability to set citation display styles in New List View was "coming" and our academics are desperate for it - would really like it bumped up the development queue!

  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    There are other reasons it would be useful to be able to include comments in the Review CSV. I've just finished reviewing a long list where I need to include feedback to the lecturer on nearly every item (eg "not in stock, insufficient funds currently to purchase this"), "more recent edition in Library", etc). If Review comments could be exported, I could have edited the CSV and used this as the basis of my feedback to her. As it is I shall have to do a lot of copying and pasting!

  5. 66 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  7. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera shared this idea  · 
  8. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    There's been no update on the comments below from myself and Rachel, dating back to last April. Could we have an update/clarification on a) whether Dashboard/Analytics in New List View does count clicks from "View Online" and b) if not, whether this can be prioritised?

    We are starting to get questions, in the current financial climate, from University leaders about the value of Aspire and like Maria, we are really handicapped in demonstrating the value of it by the fact that a great deal of our users' likely engagement (by clicking on Online Resource/View Online blue buttons) isn't being measured by Dashboard/Analytics.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    I thought I had picked up from somewhere that in New List View, the Dashboard *is* going to count clicks through from "View Online" - have I got that wrong??

  9. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera shared this idea  · 
  10. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    Tend to agree with both of you: a) the exclamation mark is generally ignored, because so many different things trigger it; and b) agree with Rachel that the "New edition" function is so inaccurate as to be useless. It appears to go off publication dates rather than edition statements, so things like e-books, paperback reprints, etc appear to trigger it. It would be so helpful if the New Edition flag were actually meaningful and reliable!

  11. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hazel Rothera shared this idea  · 
  12. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Users & Roles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog. It will be merged with a similar existing idea.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  13. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  14. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  15. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    backlog  ·  21 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  16. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    This is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    Yes, that would be really useful, for exactly the reasons stated - when you've got partial but not complete academic adoption of Aspire lists, *or* your Aspire lists are still worked on by Library staff but you want to use Aspire as a communication tool with academics, having the option to make them the recipient (or a recipient) of the Review Completed notification email would be great.

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 
  17. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  6 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Help & Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Hazel Rothera commented  · 

    Could we have an update on this please? It is something both staff and student users at Oxford Brookes would really like to see (as suggested by Lisa, with the option to customise where the report went to, since it would often be Library staff rather than the academic who had the expertise to fix a problem with metadata)

  18. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » Bookmarking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    We would like to add some additional resource types.

    However, this is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    Hazel Rothera supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base