Laura Smithson

My feedback

  1. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  2. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are currently reviewing this idea as this is an interesting concept and one we would like to explore further. If anyone would like to add their use case to this ticket it would be helpful to understand all scenarios.

    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  3. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    backlog  ·  3 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Digitised Content » Reports  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  4. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    Whilst the concierge checks the vault and copy limits on any requests received, there may be a need to check in advance of placing a request by digitisation staff, so improved searching is something we would like to address but is not currently in our near term development focus.

    It has been placed into moved to the longer term backlog.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  5. 60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  6. 48 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Talis Aspire Reading Lists » List Editing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    This is not included in the scope of the reviews refresh but so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    Laura Smithson commented  · 

    I discussed this recently with Laura Unwin and she suggested I raise again as it might be something that could move out of backlog, now Reviews Refresh is nearing completion. It would be hugely helpful for our Acquisitions process if we could make Importance compulsory. We would want to do this for books only. And presumably we could opt to have it switched on at institution level rather than it effecting all customers?

    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    We do intend to investigate the introduction of a dictionary tool which would enable configuration of local messages. This will be reviewed and prioritised following the completion of the Db re-architecture but is not a current priority

    Laura Smithson supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base