Talis Aspire Reading Lists

Welcome to Talis Aspire Ideas Forum.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Reports with more fields

    Could we please have some fields within reports as standard. If reporting about items I would like a a baseline to see the ISBN/ISSN/LCN number for stock held in the Library and ISBN/ISSN for items not held. Also, any reports that show titles should also conatin the code so that it is easy to match.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    I’m closing this as most of the suggestions have been addressed in the newer reports. The exceptions are: The acquisitions report was retired some time ago. We are currently unable to report on user activity (log-in information), whilst we are unable to ‘nest’ the hierarchy report at this point.

  2. Linking Aspire to Alto

    This suggestion has come from one of our Subject Librarians who wondered if it possible to connect Alto and Aspire so that items that appear on an Aspire reading list are noted as such in Alto? This would be useful when withdrawing items/updating editions.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Resource Type - Film

    We have a large film collection and also subscribe to BoB.

    It would be great to have a resource Type for Audio-Visual materials as book can be misleading as we may have a film and book of the same title.

    If can it also default to appropriate fields then that would be even more efficient.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Bookmarking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Screen design for license

    At the top of every list we have a large prominent diaply for the license consisting of both the logo, including the conditions, and then another spelling out of the conditions again. This is both heavy on the eye (why repeat it twice?) and an incitement for academic staff to quibble. Could we just have the logo without spelling it out twice?

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Viewing Lists & Items  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Need ability to link module to multiple departments

    In our hierarchy we have some modules which are taken across various departments within a school. We can currently only create a new module under one department, we can't link it to multiple departments. We need this ability.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Hierarchy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. retaining student numbers

    We've just discovered that the student numbers data is removed when a review on a list is completed. We need this information to be retained, it's no use having it there just for a review and then when looking back for alterations etc it's no longer there. It should be retained and displayed on the list page for the appropriate logged in users (i.e. those with list publishing rights over that list/the tenancy).

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. allowing attaching lists to modules without using My Lists

    Library staff need to attach all the loaded lists to modules and need to attach academics' lists to modules currently too. At the moment they have to go to the list, Add to My Lists, go to the module, choose that list, go back to My Lists and remove it again. Could there be a 'list search' box for the library staff role so that they can search for the list and attach it to the module without having to add it to their My Lists and then remove it again? Thanks.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Managing Invites

    I would like a management tool to see who invites have been sent to, if they have been successfully accepted and what roles have been assigned to them

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Update an item record from DOI, ISBN or LCN

    At present, Aspire offers the ability to populate a blank Bookmark from a DOI. Once a Bookmark has been Saved, the populate-from-DOI option disappears.

    There are several use cases in which the ability to update (effectively to overwrite) an Item/Bookmark record from a DOI (and also an ISBN or local LCN) look-up could be very useful.

    Case 1: An academic has created a poor quality Bookmark from a journal web site not supported by the Bookmarklet. The relevant DOI is identified, and this is added by a librarian (or other reviewer) to an 'Update' value field. Full metadata is extracted…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Library Availability - 'not yet available' statuses

    Many resource lists will trigger new Acquisitions activities, but at present the Library Availability display in the Item record is premised on items already being in stock. If items are *on their way* to being in stock, the Availability look-up fails. It would be good if the Availability display could cope with a range of 'in process' statuses (which customers could assign on a Tenancy by Tenancy basis). In our case, those statuses would include 'On order', 'In processing', and 'In Cataloguing'

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Move "other formats" link outside availability box

    We have a lot of items where the availability section is not displaying for a record (mostly due to data, we don't use 001s and I think that's required for it to display).

    In these cases, the "search for other formats/editions" link would be really useful as a title search on the catalogue will often find something, but because this link is within the availability box, it doesn't appear either.

    Would it be beneficial to be moved outside? It seems so to us at the moment, but there are probably downsides/complications in doing this, so what do others think?

    Thanks.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  chrisc responded

    The recent enhancements to the library availability area implemented this improvement.

  13. Additional metadata fields in the Acquisitions Review screen

    Our Liaison Librarian team have requested that additional metadata fields be added to the Library Review Acquisitions report (namely Author(s), Publisher and Date of Publication) "to help differentiate between items with the same title". As this has an impact on screen real-estate, perhaps a basic item citation could be formatted in a single cell?

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  chrisc responded

    You can now click through to an overlay screen on the acquisitions review screen to show the item metadata. Unfortunately there just isn’t enough room to show all these fields on the display table.

  14. Library availability - search alternatives link

    Increase text size/create button for links to both of the following...

    * View in library catalogue
    * Search the library catalogue for other formats/editions

    At the moment these links are too discrete.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Viewing Lists & Items  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    This has been done as part of the Phase 4 improvements to the item view

  15. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  chrisc responded

    Hi Hazel,

    The good news is that uou can already edit module titles if you have the node-administrator permission. Users with that permission will see an Edit link on the module page. Clicking on this link will allow you to edit the module name and description.

    If you do not see this link then you probably do not have the correct permission – in this case, you need to contact the project team at Manchester.

    Thanks,

    Chris

  16. Draft - Published Lists: workflow options

    It should be possible to have a functional/permissions combination which allows academics only to 'Submit for Library Review' and *not* to 'Publish' - enabling sites that wanted to initiate library review ahead of publication.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 'Website' as a resource type

    'Website' is not currently available as a resource type. We would like to see this made available as academics will often refer their students to review an entire site rather than just one specific web page.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 'Add new field' values in Edit

    In the manual Edit of an item, it is not currently possible to add a 'Place of Publication' - could this be added?

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Allow a user to rollover a single list to a new time period

    A list editor can manually elect to rollover a single list to a new time period.

    This is in essence an optimisation of the copy functionality - a copy of the source list is taken with the option for the user to select a new time period.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Rollover  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Record and allow reporting on empty lists, course or modules, or missing parts of the hierarchy

    This will allow customers to detect dead ends for users and take action outside the system boundary to rectify.

    Later we could think about what activities could occur within the system boundary, e.g. request a list, email notification etc.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Rollout  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  chrisc responded

    We have now created a new tenancy stats prototype, and we’ll be demoing it at the user group meeting on the 4th March. We have included the ability to report on empty nodes/modules, empty lists and also orphaned lists (i.e. those not attached to a module). There is also some basic stats reporting such as the amount of total lists in the system and the spread of resource types across the system.

  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base