Talis Aspire Digitised Content

How can we improve Copyright Clearance in Talis Aspire?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. When the British Library do not hold the item, can TADC add a "GET IT FOR ME" function that BLDSS have.

    When the British Library do not hold the item, the request is rejected via TADC. Can TADC add a "GET IT FOR ME" function that asks the BL to obtain the Copyright CLeared article from another institution. We use this function via our library management system easily enough, but it would be useful not to have to place a request twice.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      0 comments  ·  Configuration & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • A TADC API

      Specifically for usage - prints, downloads and views. We have a project that is monitoring 7 modules - the usage of the items on these modules. We want to automate the gathering of data as much as possible. We can use the Talis linked data API to get the data. For hardcopy books we can use the LCN (which is the bib number in our LMS) to retrieve loans, reservations and renewals automatically, and we would ike to be able to look up TADC data for each request. An API seems the obvious solution.

      2 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        0 comments  ·  Reading List  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • New status or reason of "Ordered from BLDCS"

        I am wasting a lot of time by reviewing Requests that are at the status of Referred / Copy Pending, when many of these have had orders sent to BLDSC. This is not obvious until you open the Request, and although this info is displayed on the right of the screen, because I am assuming that something needs to be checked / done, I am scrolling down all of the Concierge checks before I realise that we are actually waiting for a file from BL.

        Please can this be added as a reason under Referred

        2 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Making note field searchable (e.g. identifying BL requests for invoicing)

          When we receive invoices for documents supplied to us from the British Library, requests are identified by the order number which the BL allocates. This is usually in this format: 00524015.

          Currently it is not possible to match up requests on our invoice with requests in the DCM. We can input the BL order number in the note field but really this needs to be a searchable field so that when we receive an invoice we can match up items listed with requests in the DCM.

          2 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Request digitisation for resources which have online resource button ticked

            We have had feedback from a number of academics with long readings lists with a mix of online sources and resources which need to be digitised. When they edit their list , every resource as it is digitisable has a request digitisation option, which they find confusing as they want to be able to quickly navigate to those resources which aren't available online to request those only. Often we get requests from academics for digitisations in error as the presence of the request option makes then think that they need to request even though the resource is online.

            1 vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              0 comments  ·  Reading List  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • time period

              Time periods in TADC: Add the ability to either hide or remove time periods from TADC "Available for rollover' menu. QUT has 33 individual time periods and has been running TADC for 3 years which is 99 time periods to scroll through to select the most current time period. We only rollover from previous year so would like the ability to hide any time period older than 2 years without impacting on the ability to report on those earlier time periods.

              1 vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)

                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • 1 vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Add edition and date to item details in request emails

                  Currently only the the Book title, Authors/Editors and ISBN(s) are given in TADC emails (success or reject). For users who are requesting on multiple editions/years, it is not easy to work out which exact item the message refers to.

                  It would useful if these key bibliographic details could be added to the email to avoid confusion.

                  1 vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    0 comments  ·  Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Can the ticked chapter box be changed to 'opt in' rather than 'opt out'?

                    In relation to the request digitisation form we have noticed that some requests which far exceed the CLA limits are being approved by the concierge due to the 'this is one chapter' box being ticked by default. Would it be possible to make the ticking of the 'this is one chapter' box an opt in choice, rather than have it set to 'on' by default?

                    1 vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                      0 comments  ·  Request Form  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • Naming of sections of a book when requesting digitisation rather than just having the page numbers

                      Currently we are able to add the name of the chapter when requesting digitisation, but when we are using a section of a book instead there is no option to give it a name, all that is recorded are the page numbers. Sometimes academics give the section a name, or in the past we ourselves have given it a name eg. Extracts from......

                      1 vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Worklog Report

                        The purpose of the report is to produce data on reporting Service Level Agreements, as well as finding out averages, etc.

                        1 vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                          It would be really helpful to have further information on how you see this report working, are you looking for a worklog report for each requests or something at a higher level? More information may allow others to input to the idea and vote on this.

                        • Edit and pre-clear process during rollover

                          Why does no data stay in the fields when you Edit and Preclear a number of requests as it does when editing just one request?

                          It is useful to be able to see all the data and be able to change only what is necessary. This is often only one field such as student numbers or the requester. Whereas currently we have to re-enter all the field data as it opens as empty fields apart from the dates.

                          The process requires looking at one request anyway to see what the fields contain and what might need updating. Then you have…

                          1 vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                            0 comments  ·  Rollover  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Option to source from BL when scan has been uploaded

                            We would like the option of sourcing a request from BL even when the requestor has uploaded their own scan.We would like this as, where possible, we obtain an EHESS scan from BL. Currently if a copy has been uploaded there is no option to source from BL. It would be much more user friendly to have this option rather than to withdraw the request and ask the lecturer to rerequest it from the reading list.

                            1 vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)

                              We’ll send you updates on this idea

                              0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                              You can change the source of the request now when reviewing a request but we want to see if we can make this so you can raise the request via the BL using the API rather than manually.

                            • Ability to upload jpeg images in TADC - currently can only upload pdfs

                              Whilst our scanner can save images in jpeg format, TADC is only able to upload pdfs. In our Art & Design dept lecturers prefer jpegs as the format presents a much clearer detailed image. In order to encourage Art & Design lecturers (under-represented in our stats) to use TARL and TADC we would like to have the facility to upload JPEGs.

                              1 vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)

                                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                This is something Talis are working towards. Currently Talis Aspire Digitised Content only enables you to upload materials that require copyright clearance, but the Talis Player will not only enable you to upload material that needs to be copyright cleared, but also other materials.

                                Talis have been working with beta partners to develop this, and we will keep you up to date with the wider release of this through the usual updates (webinars, newsletters, events etc).

                              • Integrate TADC User Profiles with existing TARL Profiles

                                Many TADC users also have TARL.

                                Staff Users register with TARL and are assigned Priviliges.
                                Users then setup a separate Profile for TADC which requires exactly the same information that they have already supplied to TARL.

                                My Suggestiuon is that the TADC and TARL profiles are Integrated so that users don't separately register for both products.

                                1 vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  0 comments  ·  Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

                                  We do intend to merge the different profiles but its not in the near term develoopment focus.

                                  It has been placed into moved to the longer term backlog.
                                  It will graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned and are ready to implement.

                                • New users need to be able to remove existing coversheets of resubmitted materials, at DC end to avoid duplication.

                                  Existing offprints that are being re-submitted for continued use have an old BL coversheet which cannot be removed during the 'accept self-scan process'. The result is a bundle that has 2 coversheets which could be confusing. The presence of the old coversheet is however useful in identifying material as a re-submission, but should be removed from the newly created bundle.

                                  1 vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                    0 comments  ·  Packer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

                                    I agree that the coversheet options available for normal uploads should be available in this scenario. This is not in our near term development focus, but I’ve put in in the backlog for review when we have got through some already planned items

                                  • Extra fields on the report spreadsheet

                                    tTe data which appears on the report spreadsheet is currently fairly basic. We would be interested in seeing some additional fields included as standard, such as date request was made, date request made live, and the need by date - if and when there is a facility for the academic to note this - so that we are able to see how often we are able to hit this deadline.

                                    1 vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

                                      Request date, date copied and date released were added to the Requests report. This idea has been added to the backlog to add the need by date at a later point after we have addressed some planned items

                                    1 3 Next →
                                    • Don't see your idea?

                                    Feedback and Knowledge Base