How can we improve Copyright Clearance in Talis Aspire?

Identifying close matches

We are coming across some items which we have already scanned by are not being recognised because the request information doesn't exactly match the biblio of the previous request(s).

This is causing us to rescan items or order CFPs where we don't need to, costing us time and money.

If the vault search could identify other requests from the same publication using ISBN or book title (view all requests for this book doesn't seem to be too reliable) and allow us to preview these scans we could then select the appropriate scan.

25 votes
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Tania Rowlett shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    completed  ·  AdminLaura Unwin (Admin, Talis) responded  · 

    Following feedback from users, we identified that the vault was too specific in its matching to existing pdf’s in the vault.

    As a starting point in finding matches more readily, we have relaxed the logic in a few ways:
    It is no longer looking for exact title matches e.g. Oliver Twist will now match with oliver twist, whereas it would not previously, as it was case sensitive.
    It will now match variations of chapter numbers in more ways e.g. Chapter 4, Chapter Four, Ch.4, Ch. Four, ch 4, chapter.

    We identified that if a university had already purchased a Copyright Fee-pay copy from the British Library and a subsequent request was made for the exact same book section or article it was referring as Source to be acquired. We have improved this behaviour so BL Fee Pay copies are checked earlier in the worklog so they can be identified as owned.

    If this is still an area you would like to see further enhancements made please do raise again.

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Ian Long commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        We have noticed that TADC doesn't recognise previous scanned items that have been withdrawn, so this potentially causes the library to rescan items again unnecessarily . We would definitely like this to be improved.

      • Rob Melocha commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I agree. ISBN and page number are unique identifiers that would be a good criteria for matching wheras chapter titles or book titles can be interpreted and entered in different ways.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base